jolly
Well-Known Member
Something worth keeping in mind. The balance of metabolic processes in a plant is a study in economics. There is a metabolic cost to the plant, when it synthesizes compounds against its various predators. These responses are "switched" on and off, rather than being engaged continuously, because the plant's growth and reproductive success are diminished to some extent whenever it must produce aversive compounds to ward off predation. In order to balance its budget, a plant must forgo the production of something, if it increases its production of something else.
Plants "know" when they are being attacked, and have a rough categorization of the type of predation. They respond differently to simple leaf trauma, compare to leaf trauma caused by insects. If an exogenous compound (say, aspirin) triggers a response, will it be a useful response to whatever specific predatory herbivore may be present? Who knows.
Bob
Bob, I agree that plants are making decisions based on resource economy. I wonder though, that in an agricultural setting where resources are more abundant due to fertilizers and water, if those decisions are as costly.
There was a study cited in the book you recommended to me (What a Plant Knows) where they used leaf damage due to tearing as simulating insect attack. This implies that plants may not know the difference between getting eaten vs mechanical damage -- whereas they do make a distinction between getting eaten and being infected with disease. I haven't seen any study of trying to treat leaves with chemicals to induce these resistances -- though I haven't looked either.