Pics of your sticks!!

Status
Not open for further replies.

Jim D

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2017
Messages
150
Points
93
gwuvoBs.jpg


6.5 x 56. 4 ligeros, 2 viso, 1 seco, triple binder.
Wow, 4 ligeros! This is way outside the old weighting structure, how'd you come up with a blend like this?
 

waikikigun

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2015
Messages
1,453
Points
113
Wow, 4 ligeros! This is way outside the old weighting structure, how'd you come up with a blend like this?
The weighting structure is super affected by the wrapper. So whereas this filler would be a disaster with a brown wrapper, it just makes for a strong yet floral/sweet/spicy smoke with a blond wrapper that ties all those things together. This thing is a 3+3+3+3+2+2+1, 17/7 = 2.4, so it's just on the strong end of the scale, rather than the ridiculous end. Put a corojo oscuro wrapper on there and it smokes like a 4, i.e.g terribly bad.

Conversely, 3 secos wrapped in corojo oscuro smokes like a 2.
 

waikikigun

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2015
Messages
1,453
Points
113
"Weighting structure?" Where did that come from? Whose weighting? Weighting of what?

Bob
I devised a formula and wrote an app for it many years ago, based on what I was seeing and strengths I was experiencing from 100s of deconstructed cigars. It was the sort of project that made many people righteously indignated, but which I found pleasurable to do and some found helpful.

Ligero = 3, viso 2, seco 1. A cigar with that filler and a medium wrapper and light binder produces a "2," a medium. Almost all Cuban cigars are between 1.75 (mild-medium) and 1.9 (medium). The max for a commercial cigar is usually 2.2.
 

waikikigun

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2015
Messages
1,453
Points
113
You appear to be asserting that all ligero is of equal strength.

Bob
My app allowed one to input any weight for each priming. Therefore if they felt their ligero was "milder than average," they could input weight of 2.5, or whatever they wanted. There's no assumption that my rolling friends are clueless idiots who don't understand that tobacco strength and blending are completely subjective. It's just a fun tool I made to play around with.
 

waikikigun

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2015
Messages
1,453
Points
113
Explain the wrapper strength please.
Since this was based almost entirely on Cuban cigars, it was assumed that a wrapper of similar strength to a typical Cuban wrapper was used, something along the strength of a mild viso. It was also understood that wrappers, which may typically be around 1/10th of the cigar mass, exert a strongly disproportionate effect on strength perception, such that a given filler blend could be perceived as much too strong with most dark, under-fermented wrappers. I summed up the philosophy with this exchange:
"How much of the flavor comes from the wrapper?"
"One hundred percent."
Literal-minded, inexperienced rollers would not understand this. Others would get it right away. It would be nearly impossible to detect that an identical filler and binder were used between two cigars when was wrapped in a strong maduro habano and one wrapped in a mild CT. Subjectively they taste "one-hundred percent different."
 

deluxestogie

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 25, 2011
Messages
26,261
Points
113
Location
near Blacksburg, VA
Quantifying the qualitative is fun and handy, but perhaps misleading. If, for example, "strength" of a leaf is entirely its nicotine content, then that works as a number. If other factors come into play when perceiving "strength", then subjectivity muddies the numerical clarity.

I suspect that a novice is more easily misdirected by a numerical rating than someone more experienced.

Bob
 

waikikigun

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2015
Messages
1,453
Points
113
Quantifying the qualitative is fun and handy, but perhaps misleading. If, for example, "strength" of a leaf is entirely its nicotine content, then that works as a number. If other factors come into play when perceiving "strength", then subjectivity muddies the numerical clarity.

I suspect that a novice is more easily misdirected by a numerical rating than someone more experienced.

Bob
On the plus side, the novice will soon enough get straight on these questions. I think a lot of things are like this, in terms of the learning process: a few "rules" can be handy to kickstart stuff. From there make adjustments and move gradually from roteness to conceptual understanding, through experience. It's easy to forget that beginning rollers often barely have a clue there's something called seco or ligero in there, let along how they might proportion them or what their relative strengths are.
 

MysticMapacho

Active Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2019
Messages
41
Points
33
Location
Atlanta
D0AE2C87-FCDB-4410-A658-34ACB473873C.jpeg
Here’s my second attempt at rolling.

So much easier when you have proper cigar tobacco.

Basically just pulled out two leaves of filler of each type plus a wrapper and got to work. Took me 15 minutes from start to finish. I let it sit for a couple of hours and smoked it a little while ago. A bit stronger than I would have liked but had a nice flavor. I’m thinking it may have been a lot better if it rested a couple months.

Filler in equal parts -
Criollo 98 Seco
Cibao Valley Vuelta Abajo Had. Ligero
T-13 Dominican Criollo 98

Ecuador Maduro wrapper which I also used as a binder.
 

tullius

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2019
Messages
892
Points
93
Location
NE Ohio
Do you and your sticks a favor and rest as many as you can for a couple months and try them then as well. I did the same as you with my first cigars..

I didn't say all Bob, don't have a conniption. :)
 

waikikigun

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2015
Messages
1,453
Points
113
Pies out of the oven, root veg in, my chance to get out there and take a break. Rolled this live on Youtube a few nights ago. It's pretty strong! Between all that ligero and that glass of porto, I got a little buzz goin on. Michelle came out and sat next to me in the sunny patch and said, "You look deep in thought." Happy Thanksgiving!

l46Icbq.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top