Wow, 4 ligeros! This is way outside the old weighting structure, how'd you come up with a blend like this?![]()
6.5 x 56. 4 ligeros, 2 viso, 1 seco, triple binder.
Wow, 4 ligeros! This is way outside the old weighting structure, how'd you come up with a blend like this?![]()
6.5 x 56. 4 ligeros, 2 viso, 1 seco, triple binder.
The weighting structure is super affected by the wrapper. So whereas this filler would be a disaster with a brown wrapper, it just makes for a strong yet floral/sweet/spicy smoke with a blond wrapper that ties all those things together. This thing is a 3+3+3+3+2+2+1, 17/7 = 2.4, so it's just on the strong end of the scale, rather than the ridiculous end. Put a corojo oscuro wrapper on there and it smokes like a 4, i.e.g terribly bad.Wow, 4 ligeros! This is way outside the old weighting structure, how'd you come up with a blend like this?
I devised a formula and wrote an app for it many years ago, based on what I was seeing and strengths I was experiencing from 100s of deconstructed cigars. It was the sort of project that made many people righteously indignated, but which I found pleasurable to do and some found helpful."Weighting structure?" Where did that come from? Whose weighting? Weighting of what?
Bob
My app allowed one to input any weight for each priming. Therefore if they felt their ligero was "milder than average," they could input weight of 2.5, or whatever they wanted. There's no assumption that my rolling friends are clueless idiots who don't understand that tobacco strength and blending are completely subjective. It's just a fun tool I made to play around with.You appear to be asserting that all ligero is of equal strength.
Bob
Since this was based almost entirely on Cuban cigars, it was assumed that a wrapper of similar strength to a typical Cuban wrapper was used, something along the strength of a mild viso. It was also understood that wrappers, which may typically be around 1/10th of the cigar mass, exert a strongly disproportionate effect on strength perception, such that a given filler blend could be perceived as much too strong with most dark, under-fermented wrappers. I summed up the philosophy with this exchange:Explain the wrapper strength please.
On the plus side, the novice will soon enough get straight on these questions. I think a lot of things are like this, in terms of the learning process: a few "rules" can be handy to kickstart stuff. From there make adjustments and move gradually from roteness to conceptual understanding, through experience. It's easy to forget that beginning rollers often barely have a clue there's something called seco or ligero in there, let along how they might proportion them or what their relative strengths are.Quantifying the qualitative is fun and handy, but perhaps misleading. If, for example, "strength" of a leaf is entirely its nicotine content, then that works as a number. If other factors come into play when perceiving "strength", then subjectivity muddies the numerical clarity.
I suspect that a novice is more easily misdirected by a numerical rating than someone more experienced.
Bob
..with the leftovers..4.8 X 48
from the center, Cibao Corojo Viso and Criollo 98 Viso, Criollo 98 Seco and, Rene Seco fillers. 3 lamina with 2 veins from PA and Vuelta Abajo binders with, Criollo 98 Wrappers.
![]()

We discuss any variety of tobacco, as well as numerous approaches to growing, harvesting, curing, and finishing your crop. Our members will attempt to provide experience-based answers to your questions.